Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
    • PYQ Mastery Program
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
      • PYQ Mastery Program
    • Portal Login

    Cross border insolvency

    • November 29, 2021
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

     

     

    Cross border insolvency

    Subject: Economy

    Context:

    The ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has published a draft framework for cross border insolvency proceedings based on the UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) model under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

    Concept:

    • Cross border insolvency proceedings are relevant for the resolution of distressed companies with assets and liabilities across multiple jurisdictions. A framework for cross border insolvency Proceedings allows for the location of such a company’s foreign assets, the identification of creditors and their claims and establishing payment
    • towards claims as well as a process for coordination between court in different countries.
    • While foreign creditors can make claims against a domestic company, the IBC currently doesnot allow for automatic recognition of any insolvency proceedings in other countries. In the case of Jet Airways, when one of the company’s
    • aircraft was grounded in Amsterdam over non-payment of dues to a European cargo firm, the National Company Law Tribunal had declined to “take on record” any orders of a foreign court regarding domestic insolvency proceedings in the absence of enabling provision in the IBC.
    • The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, however, permitted the recognition of Dutch proceedings as “non-main insolvency proceedings” recognising India as the Centre Of Main Interests(COMI) for the company.
    • However, current provisions under the IBC do not allow Indian courts to address the issue of foreign assets of a company being subjected to parallel insolvency proceedings in other jurisdictions.
    • The UNCITRAL model is the most widely accepted legal framework to deal with cross- border insolvency
    • It has been adopted by 49 countries, including the UK, the US, South Africa, South Korea and Singapore.

    UNCITRAL:

    • The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law is the core legal body of the United Nations system in the field of international trade law.
    • UNCITRAL was established in 1966 with a recognition that international trade cooperation among States is an important factor in the promotion of friendly relations and, consequently, in the maintenance of peace and security.
    • Through its several model laws, conventions, legislative guides and robust debates in working groups, UNCITRAL has provided a valuable platform for countries to compare, examine, debate and adopt principles of international commercial and trade law appropriate to their circumstances.
    • Since its inception, India is only one of eight countries that has been a member of UNCITRAL.

    UNCITRAL Model Law- The model law deals with four major principles of cross-border insolvency:

    • Direct access to foreign insolvency professionals and foreign creditors to participate in or commence domestic insolvency proceedings against a defaulting debtor.
    • Recognition of foreign proceedings & provision of remedies.
    • Cooperation between domestic and foreign courts & domestic and foreign insolvency practitioners.
    • Coordination between two or more concurrent insolvency proceedings in different countries. The main proceeding is determined by the concept of centre of main interest (COMI).
    Cross border insolvency economy
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search