Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
    • PYQ Mastery Program
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
      • PYQ Mastery Program
    • Portal Login

    Move towards e­FIR, but with caution

    • November 9, 2023
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

     

     

    Move towards e­FIR, but with caution

    Subject :Polity

    Section: Msc

    Context:

    • The Law Commission of India, in Report No. 282, recommended that “in cases where the accused is not known, registration of an e­FIR should be allowed for all cognisable offences”. 
    • If the accused is known, as a preliminary step, registration of an e­FIR may be allowed for cognisable offences wherein the punishment provided under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and other laws is up to three years.

    Recommendations from law commissions report

    • e-FIR Recommendation: Proposal for e-FIR registration in all cognizable offenses with unknown accused. Verification through OTP and Aadhaar ID proof suggested by the Law Commission.
    • Verification Process: Complainant verification through OTP for authenticity. Aadhaar ID proof mandated to confirm the complainant’s identity.
    • Information Deletion: Automatic deletion of unverified information within two weeks. Complainant’s failure to sign the e-FIR within the prescribed time leads to deletion.
    • Timeframe for Physical Signing: Complainants given three days to physically sign the e-FIR for formal registration. Failure to sign within the stipulated time results in non-registration.
    • Human Intervention: The article emphasizes the importance of human interaction in certain cases, suggesting that electronic registration may be suitable only for offenses where immediate police interaction is not crucial.

    An e-FIR

    • Definition: Digital system for reporting crimes to the police.
    • Process: Information submitted online through a national portal. Complainant required to physically sign the report within a specified timeframe (usually three days).
    • Objective: Streamline crime registration with initial electronic submission.

    Cognisable offences

    • Cognizable Offenses Definition: Offenses for which police can make an arrest without a warrant. Immediate police action is permissible upon receiving information or a complaint.
    • Serious Nature: Generally involves more severe crimes. Examples include murder, robbery, kidnapping, and certain types of fraud.
    • No Court Permission Needed: Law enforcement can initiate an investigation without court authorization. Immediate action can be taken by the police upon learning about the offense.
    • Jurisdictional Variations: Classification as cognizable or non-cognizable may vary in different legal systems. The severity and nature of offenses determine their categorization.

    Challenges:

    • Limited Efficacy: The concept of e-FIR relies on obtaining information electronically but requires physical signatures within a prescribed time, limiting the effectiveness of the online process.
    • Lack of Discussion: The article notes that the Law Commission did not discuss models adopted by states currently lodging e-FIRs, leading to potential gaps in understanding the practical implementation.
    Move towards e­FIR Polity
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search