Kerala challenges withholding of Presidential assent to State bills in Supreme Court
- March 24, 2024
- Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
- Category: DPN Topics
No Comments
Kerala challenges withholding of Presidential assent to State bills in Supreme Court
Subject: Polity
Section: Parliament and Legislature
Context:
- In an unprecedented move, the Kerala Government on March 23 filed an appeal in the Supreme Court as President Droupadi Murmu has withheld assent for four Bills passed by the Kerala Legislature without disclosing any reasons.
More on news:
- It has also moved the Court against Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan’s office for keeping the Bills pending for a long and indefinite period, and later reserving them for the consideration of the President.
- The act of the President in withholding the assent for the four Bills without giving any reason was highly arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 200 and 201 of the Constitution.
- The reference of the seven Bills to the President has to be recalled on the grounds of Constitutional morality.
State Government’s views:
- The State contends that the actions of the Union Government in advising the President to withhold assent to Bills passed by the Legislative Assembly 11 to 24 months back, which were wholly within the domain of the State Government, subverted and disrupted the federal structure of the Constitution.
- It was also a grave encroachment into the domain entrusted to the State under the Constitution.
Reservation of Bills under Article 201:
Article 201 (Bills reserved for consideration)
- When a Bill is reserved by a Governor for the consideration of the President, the President shall declare either that he assents to the Bill or that he withholds assent therefrom.
- Notably, there is no specified timeframe for the President to decide on the Bill’s outcome.
- Provided that, where the Bill is not a Money Bill, the President may direct the Governor to return the Bill to the House or, as the case may be, the Houses of the Legislature of the State together with such a message as is mentioned in the first provision to Article 200.
- When a Bill is so returned, the House or Houses shall reconsider it accordingly within a period of six months from the date of receipt of such message and, if it is again passed by the House or Houses with or without amendment, it shall be presented again to the President for his consideration.