Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
    • PYQ Mastery Program
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
      • PYQ Mastery Program
    • Portal Login

    Article 341 and 342

    • August 31, 2020
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

    Subject: Polity

    Context:

    The Supreme Court has given cogent reasons for a reconsideration of the verdict given by a five-judge Bench in 2004 that State legislatures have no power to create sub-classifications among the list of Scheduled Castes notified by the President

    Concept:

    • The Bench has disagreed with the formulation in V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004)that classifying Scheduled Castes into groups amounts to ‘tinkering’ with the Presidential list.
    • Articles 341 and 342, empower the President of India to draw up a list of schedule castes and tribes.
    • If such a notification is related to a state, then also President will notify the same. However, it can be done after consultation with the governor of the state
    • Any inclusion or exclusion from the presidential notification of any caste, race, or tribe can be done by Parliament by Law.
    • If any question arises whether or not particular tribe is a tribe within the meaning of this article one has to look at the public notification issued by the president.
    Article 341 and 342 Polity
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search