Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
    • Portal Login

    SC verdict on same sex marriages

    • October 18, 2023
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

     

     

    SC verdict on same sex marriages

    Subject: Polity

    Section: Constitution

    More about the news:

    • A five-judge Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, issued a unanimous ruling against legalizing same-sex marriage in India, also rejecting civil unions for non-heterosexual couples in a 3:2 verdict.
    • They stated that Parliament should decide on the issue, emphasizing the inability of the court to alter provisions or interpretations of the Special Marriage Act.
    • The petitions aimed for a gender-neutral reading of the Special Marriage Act to include same-sex marriages, but the majority view was that there is no fundamental right to marry.
    • The court deliberated for ten days in April and May, considering various arguments related to equality, privacy, legal rights, and the impact on children.
    • Opponents included the Central government, the NCPCR, and the Jamiat-Ulama-i-Hind.

    What are the key takeaways from the verdict

    • Right to marry not a fundamental right
      • All five judges on the Bench agreed that there is no fundamental right to marry under the Constitution.
    • Not possible to tweak the Special Marriage Act (SMA), 1954
      • All five judges also unanimously agreed that it is not possible to tweak the Special Marriage Act ,1954 by using gender neutral language to allow same-sex marriage.
      • Alternatively, the petitioners had asked for striking down provisions of the SMA that are gender-restrictive.
      • CJI said striking down the SMA provisions would jeopardize the legal framework for interfaith and inter-caste couples.
      • He added that interpreting the SMA in a gender-neutral way would amount to judicial lawmaking, which would violate the doctrine of separation of powers.
    • Declined to allow civil unions for non-heterosexual couples:
      • The bench ruled in a 3:2 verdict against civil unions for non-heterosexual couples.
      • The dissenting judges said that the right to form unions emanates from the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression, and the right to life.
      • The minority views of the two judges held that the right to enter into a union cannot be restricted on the basis of sexual orientation.
      • Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is violative of Article 15 of the Constitution.
      • The majority views held that it was for the legislature, and not the Court, to formally recognise and grant legal status to non-heterosexual relationships.
    • On the bouquet of rights
      • All five judges acknowledged that a high-level Cabinet committee will assess the rights for non-heterosexual couples, including joint bank accounts, beneficiary status in financial matters, and the ability to make medical decisions for one another.
    • On rights to adopt children
    • The Supreme Court unanimously recognized that one’s sexual orientation should not determine their suitability as adoptive parents.
    • However, in a 3:2 split verdict, the existing regulations denying unmarried and queer couples the right to adopt children as a couple were upheld.
    • Due to the inability for same-sex couples to marry under Indian law, they resorted to designating one partner as the legal parent, a practice subsequently addressed by the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) in 2022.
    • CARA imposed stricter regulations, requiring couples to be in a stable marital relationship for two years and prohibiting adoption for those in live-in relationships, thereby rendering queer couples ineligible to adopt.
    • The minority view by CJI Chandrachud and Justice Kaul said the CARA guidelines discriminate against atypical, unmarried couples to adopt children.

    What is Special Marriage Act:

    • The Special Marriage Act of 1954 (SMA) provides an alternate route to religious laws for marriage.
    •  It governs a civil marriage where the state sanctions the marriage rather than the religion.

    Who can get married under the Special Marriage Act:

    • The applicability of the Act extends to the people of all faiths, including Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists, across India.
    • The minimum age to get married under the Special Marriage Act is 21 years for males and 18 years for females.

    What are the provisions of Special Marriage Act:

    • As per Section 5 of the Act, the parties to the marriage are required to give a notice, in writing, to a “Marriage Officer” of the district in which at least one of the parties has resided for at least 30 days immediately preceding the notice.
    • The parties and three witnesses are required to sign a declaration form before the Marriage Officer.
    • Once the declaration is accepted, the parties will be given a “Certificate of marriage” which is essentially proof of the marriage
    Polity SC verdict on same sex marriages
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search