Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
    • PYQ Mastery Program
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
      • PYQ Mastery Program
    • Portal Login

    The principle of lis alibi pendens and Forum non conveniens

    • August 21, 2022
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

     

     

    The principle of lis alibi pendens and Forum non conveniens

    Subject: Polity

    Section:

    Context: The Madras High court only the Karnataka High Court can decide a dispute related to removing a Bengaluru medical college from the ambit of a deemed-to-be university in Chennai.

    Concept: 

    • Federalism is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution and it applies to the judiciary as well.
    • A High Court in one State cannot exercise powers which, under normal circumstances, can be exercised only by the High Court in another State,

    The principle of Forumnon conveniens  

    • Forum non conveniens is a common law legal doctrine through which a court acknowledges that another forum or a court where the case might have been brought is a more appropriate venue for a legal case and transfers the case to such a forum.
    •  A concern often raised in applications of  the doctrine is forum shopping or picking a court merely to gain advantage in a proceeding.

    The principle of lis alibi pendens  

    • The principle of lis alibi pendens (a dispute pending elsewhere) applies to address the problem of potentially contradictory judgments.
    • If two courts were to hear the same dispute, it is possible for them to reach inconsistent decisions.
    •  Lis alibi pendens arises from the international comity and it permits a court to refuse exercising jurisdiction when there is a parallel litigation pending in another jurisdiction.

    The case:

    • The ‘2019 ambit notification’ passed by the Union Ministry of Education declaring that the Bengaluru college would fall within the ambit of the Chennai university.
    • The State government had also filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court in 2020, challenging the ‘2019 ambit notification’ .A joint writ petition filed against the withdrawal of the  ‘2019 ambit notification’
    • The Karnataka High court rejected the argument that a part of cause of action had arisen in Chennai due of the location of the university and therefore, the Madras High Court could entertain the case.
    • The Madras High court only the Karnataka High Court can decide a dispute related to removing a Bengaluru medical college from the ambit of a deemed-to-be university in Chennai.
    • The appropriate court for deciding the lis (dispute) is the Karnataka High Court
    Polity The principle of lis alibi pendens and Forum non conveniens
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search