Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
    • PYQ Mastery Program
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
      • PYQ Mastery Program
    • Portal Login

    Why Chandrayaan 2 failed?

    • June 29, 2023
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

     

     

    Why Chandrayaan 2 failed?

    Subject : Science and technology

    Section: Space technology

    Concept :

    • The landing of Vikram was targeted for a plane about 600 km from the south pole of the Moon. However, ISRO lost contact with their lander shortly before the scheduled touchdown on September 7.
    • When contact was lost, it was travelling at 50 to 60 metres per second (180 to 200 km per hour).
    • It was decelerating, but not fast enough to slow down to a speed of 2 metres/second (7.2 km/hr) that was required for a safe landing. Vikram was designed to absorb the shock of an impact even at 5 metres/second (18 km/hr).
    • At the rate it was decelerating, it could not even have attained a speed of 5 metres/second before touchdown. It hit the Moon at a far greater speed, damaging itself and the instruments on board.

    What was missed because of the crash landing?

    • The most obvious miss was the opportunity to demonstrate the technology to make a soft landing in outer space.
    • Isro scientists at the time said the accident was caused by a relatively small error that had been identified and corrected. The soon-to-be-launched Chandrayaan-3 mission will demonstrate this technology, hopefully, without any glitches.
    • The lander Vikram and rover Pragyaan were carrying instruments to carry out observations on the surface.
    • These were supposed to pick up additional information about the terrain, composition and mineralogy.
    • With the support of the Orbiter, Vikram and Pragyaan would have provided two diverse sets of data that could have helped prepare a more composite picture of the Moon.

    For further notes on Chandrayaan 2 and its findings, refer – https://optimizeias.com/chandrayaan-2/

    Science and tech Why Chandrayaan 2 failed?
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search