Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
  • Portal Login
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
  • Portal Login

CARBON CAPTURE BY FORESTS

  • February 27, 2022
  • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
  • Category: DPN Topics
No Comments

 

 

CARBON CAPTURE BY FORESTS

TOPIC: Environment

Context- Conservationists have noted plantations outside forest don’t capture carbon efficiently or make up for biodiversity losses.

  • Trees on forest edges may grow faster than those inside.

Concept-

Forests as Storehouses of carbon:

  • The forest in the world that are major storehouses of carbon.
  • In net, forests store more carbon dioxide than they release and an estimated 30% of carbon emissions from emitting fossil fuels are absorbed by the forest, mak­ing them a terrestrial carbon sink.
  • Trees absorb carbon diox­ide (CO2), release oxygen by way of photosynthesis, and store carbon in their trunks.
  • When they shed, soil mi­crobes work to decompose the leaves and other organic matter that releases the trapped carbon dioxide.

Differential growth:

  • Data from the U.S. De­partment of Agriculture’s Forest Inventory and Analy­sis program found trees on the forest edges grow nearly twice as fast as interior trees.
  • This is likely because the trees on the edge don’t have competition with interior forest, so they get more light.

Soil behaviour:

  • Warmer tempera­tures at the edge of the forest caused leaves and organic matter to decompose faster, as it forced soil microorgan­isms to work harder and re­lease more carbon dioxide than their cooler, more shad­ed peers in the forest inte­rior.

Role of plantations:

  • Plantations like western ghats de­plete groundwater, have higher surface water runoff, poorer soil infiltration, com­pared to trees in natural for­ests.
  • The carbon stocks in plantations such as teak and eucalyptus were 30% to 50% lower than in natural evergreen forests.
  • They are generally less sta­ble and resilient.
  • The biggest loss, however, is that of spe­cies dependent on forests— from insects to primates— are ripped apart from their natural habitats and planta­tions, which are mostly monocultures, rarely had the capacity to support a rich, biodiverse system.
CARBON CAPTURE BY FORESTS Environment

Recent Posts

  • Daily Prelims Notes 23 March 2025 March 23, 2025
  • Challenges in Uploading Voting Data March 23, 2025
  • Fertilizers Committee Warns Against Under-Funding of Nutrient Subsidy Schemes March 23, 2025
  • Tavasya: The Fourth Krivak-Class Stealth Frigate Launched March 23, 2025
  • Indo-French Naval Exercise Varuna 2024 March 23, 2025
  • No Mismatch Between Circulating Influenza Strains and Vaccine Strains March 23, 2025
  • South Cascade Glacier March 22, 2025
  • Made-in-India Web Browser March 22, 2025
  • Charting a route for IORA under India’s chairship March 22, 2025
  • Mar-a-Lago Accord and dollar devaluation March 22, 2025

About

If IAS is your destination, begin your journey with Optimize IAS.

Hi There, I am Santosh I have the unique distinction of clearing all 6 UPSC CSE Prelims with huge margins.

I mastered the art of clearing UPSC CSE Prelims and in the process devised an unbeatable strategy to ace Prelims which many students struggle to do.

Contact us

moc.saiezimitpo@tcatnoc

For More Details

Work with Us

Connect With Me

Course Portal
Search