Centre has opposed Odisha’s plans for landmark Lingaraj Temple

  • April 7, 2022
  • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
  • Category: DPN Topics
No Comments
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

 

Centre has opposed Odisha’s plans for landmark Lingaraj Temple

Subject: History

Section: Art and Culture

Context: The Central government has told the Odisha government that its ordinance to bring the 11th-century Lingaraj temple in Bhubaneswar and its associated temples under a special law is outside the legislative competence of the state legislature.

Background:

  • In December 2019, the Odisha Government had announced a development plan for the temple and its peripheral area in Bhubaneshwar. The 66-acre “EkamraKshetra” development plan was launched to preserve the heritage and development of the nine sites and their nearby areas at a cost of around Rs 700 crore.
  • The first phase of the project includes outer access road development, Lingaraj entry plaza, Bindusagar revival plan, parking space, heritage complex, development of amenities for KedarGouri- Mukteswar complex, e-auto project, relocation project and a state-of-the-art interpretation centre.
  • The Lingaraj Temple Ordinance of 2020 was introduced to manage the rituals and other activities of the temple and eight other associated temples. This was intended to be on similar lines of the special Act which manages the affairs of the Jagannath temple in Puri, one of the four dhams in India. At present, the Lingaraj temple is being governed under the Odisha Hindu Religious Endowment Act.
  • The ordinance proposed the formation of Lingaraj Temple Managing Committee with a full-time administrator looking after day-to-day affairs of the shrine. Under the Act, a fund creation was proposed to deposit income derived from immovable and movable properties of the temple. The temple has around 1,500 acres in various parts of the state and the lands in most of the places are under encroachment.
  • The ordinance was passed by the state cabinet on December 15, 2020.Since the Assembly was not in session, the new law was proposed to be enacted through an ordinance.

Why has the Centre opposed the ordinance?

  • The Ministry of Home Affairs has said several sections of the proposed ordinance were in conflict with the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (AMASR) Act. The AMASR Act provides for preservation of ancient and historical monuments and archaeological sites and remains of national importance.
  • Ministry has pointed out that the state government has already violated the AMASR Act around Lingaraj temple by building modern structures.
  • The ministry contended that since the ordinance covers 12 centrally protected monuments including the Lingaraj temple and three tanks, it was outside the legislative competence of the state legislature as it violates the provisions of AMASR Act, 1958. The ministry has further said that an independent Act vesting administrative power to a managing committee, thus facilitating dual administrative authorities will result in conflict.
  • Specifying certain points of contention, the ministry pointed out that clause 15(2) of the Odisha ordinance has a provision for retail shops for sale of commodities inside or outside of the temples. But as per AMASR Act a monument should not be used for any other purposes not consistent with its character.
  • Similarly, as per clause 17(3) of the Odisha ordinance, the managing committee will oversee the lease or sale of movable or immovable property attached with the Lingaraj temple. But the ministry contended that movable property may include archaeological or artistic object (meaning antiques) and in that case, it will be in conflict with the AMASR Act, 1958.
  • Under clause 22(2d) of the ordinance which provides for certain powers to the temple committee to undertake repairs, for which the Archaeological Survey of India is responsible. Therefore, this clause is also in contradiction with the provision of the AMASR Act, 1958, the ministry said.
  • Another clause which facilitates special darshan on payment of a fee was also found in violation of the existing agreement between ASI and temple management; which clearly stipulates the public would have free access to the monument.
  • The ordinance also provides for repair and construction of new buildings while the centre contended that constructions can only be allowed by the National Monuments Authority.

Lingaraj Temple

https://optimizeias.com/lingaraj-temple

Odisha Temple Architecture

https://optimizeias.com/odisha-temple-architecture/

AMASR ACT

https://optimizeias.com/amasr-act

Centre has opposed Odisha’s plans for landmark Lingaraj Temple History