Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
    • Portal Login

    New Alzheimer’s Drugs Don’t Deserve the Hype – Here’s Why

    • September 12, 2023
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

     

     

    New Alzheimer’s Drugs Don’t Deserve the Hype – Here’s Why

    Subject: Science and technology

    Section: Health

    Introduction

    • Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that causes cognitive decline, memory loss, and behavioral changes, primarily affecting older adults.
    • Introduction to three drugs (aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab) that target amyloid, the protein linked to Alzheimer’s disease.
    • The breakthrough in slowing cognitive decline.

    Four Key Shortcomings of New Alzheimer’s Drugs

    1. Tiny Benefits
    • In the donanemab trial, drug-treated patients declined by an average of ten points on a 144-point cognitive scale.
    • The placebo group declined by 13 points, indicating cognitive decline in all groups.
    • The small difference in cognitive decline reduction may not be noticeable to doctors.
    1. Side-Effects
    • Regular MRI scans found evidence of brain bleeding in one in six lecanemab-treated individuals and brain swelling in one in eight.
    • The long-term effects of these brain changes are unknown, and there have been a few deaths attributed to these drugs.
    1. Very Expensive
    • Aducanumab was initially marketed in the US for $45,000 per patient per year (later reduced to $20,000).
    • Lecanemab costs $26,500 per patient per year.
    • Additional costs include scans for eligibility, side-effect monitoring, infusion clinic staff, and ongoing amyloid clearance monitoring.
    • Patients also face regular clinic visits and concerns about side effects.
    1. Highly Selective Trials
    • The trials were highly selective, excluding patients with conditions other than amyloid-related pathology and significant medical problems.
    • The narrow eligibility criteria raise concerns about translating trial efficacy into real-world clinical effectiveness.

    Additional Concerns

    • The trials targeted patients at the earliest disease stages, but even with successful amyloid clearance, cognitive decline persisted.
    • Participants in the trials were younger on average than typical Alzheimer’s patients.
    • Advocates exploring alternative treatment options beyond anti-amyloid drugs.
    New Alzheimer’s Drugs Don’t Deserve the Hype – Here’s Why Science and tech
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search