SC sets aside dismissal of two women judicial officers

  • March 1, 2025
  • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
  • Category: DPN Topics
No Comments

 

 

SC sets aside dismissal of two women judicial officers

Sub: Polity

Sec: Judiciary

Context:

  • The Supreme Court ruled on February 28, 2025, that the judiciary must be more sensitive to the well-being of women judges.
  • The case involved two women judicial officers from Madhya Pradesh who were dismissed despite one facing personal trauma, including a miscarriage.
  • Justice B.V. Nagarathna emphasized the need for a supportive work environment for women in the judiciary.

Supreme Court’s Observations

  • The judiciary must ensure a sensitive and inclusive workplace for women judges.
  • Gender cannot excuse inefficiency but must be considered in workplace policies.
  • More women in the judiciary can break stereotypes and promote gender equality.
  • Women’s visibility in courts can encourage more women to seek justice.
  • The Supreme Court reinstated the dismissed judges and termed their removal “punitive, arbitrary, and illegal.”

Legal Provisions for Women’s Workplace Protection

  • Article 10 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Provides special protection to mothers before and after childbirth.
  • Article 11 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW): Requires states to prevent workplace discrimination against women.
  • The court acknowledged that issues like miscarriage could be physically and mentally exhausting for women judges.

Workplace Challenges for Women in Judiciary

  • Long working hours and heavy caseloads create stress for women judges.
  • Women often work through menstrual pain, sometimes relying on medication.
  • Justice Nagarathna remarked that men would understand the difficulty if they experienced menstruation.
  • Lack of institutional support can impact women’s performance and career growth.

Appointment and Removal of District Judges

Appointment:

  • Governed by Article 233 of the Indian Constitution.
  • District judges are appointed by the Governor in consultation with the High Court.
  • Candidates must have at least seven years of experience as an advocate and be recommended by the High Court.

Removal:

  • Governed by Article 235, which gives the High Court control over district judiciary administration.
  • District judges can be removed by the Governor based on the High Court’s recommendation.
  • They can be dismissed for inefficiency, misconduct, or failure to perform duties.
  • The Supreme Court can intervene in cases of arbitrary or unfair dismissal.
Polity SC sets aside dismissal of two women judicial officers