Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
  • Portal Login
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
  • Portal Login

Should Convicted Persons Be Allowed to Contest Elections?

  • February 13, 2025
  • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
  • Category: DPN Topics
No Comments

 

 

Should Convicted Persons Be Allowed to Contest Elections?

Sub: Polity

Sec: Elections

Context: The Supreme Court is currently hearing petitions seeking a lifetime ban on convicted persons from contesting elections. The issue revolves around legal provisions, judicial precedents, and the broader implications of criminalization in politics.

Legal Provisions Under the Representation of the People Act, 195

  • Disqualification Based on Conviction
    • Section 8(3): A person convicted of a criminal offense and sentenced to at least two years of imprisonment is disqualified from contesting elections.
    • This disqualification lasts for six years after the person’s release.
  • Disqualification for Specific Offenses
    • Section 8(1): Certain heinous crimes lead to disqualification regardless of the duration of the sentence. These include:
      • Rape
      • Offenses under the Protection of Civil Rights Act (untouchability)
      • Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)
      • Prevention of Corruption Act,etc.
    • The disqualification period extends to six years beyond the release from prison.

Election Commission’s Power to Remove Disqualification

  • Section 11: The Election Commission (EC) has the authority to reduce or remove the disqualification period.
  • In 2019, the EC controversially reduced the disqualification period of Prem Singh Tamang, allowing him to contest elections despite a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Key Supreme Court Judgments on Decriminalization of Politics

  • Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) Case (2002)
    • Mandated that candidates must disclose their criminal records.
  • CEC vs. Jan Chaukidar (2013)
    • The Patna High Court ruled that undertrial prisoners are not eligible to contest elections since they are not ‘electors.’
    • The Supreme Court upheld this decision, but Parliament later overturned it through an amendment.
  • Lily Thomas Case (2013)
    • Struck down Section 8(4) of the RP Act, which allowed sitting legislators to continue in office despite conviction if they filed an appeal.
    • As a result, a sitting legislator is now immediately disqualified upon conviction.
Polity Should Convicted Persons Be Allowed to Contest Elections?

Recent Posts

  • Daily Prelims Notes 23 March 2025 March 23, 2025
  • Challenges in Uploading Voting Data March 23, 2025
  • Fertilizers Committee Warns Against Under-Funding of Nutrient Subsidy Schemes March 23, 2025
  • Tavasya: The Fourth Krivak-Class Stealth Frigate Launched March 23, 2025
  • Indo-French Naval Exercise Varuna 2024 March 23, 2025
  • No Mismatch Between Circulating Influenza Strains and Vaccine Strains March 23, 2025
  • South Cascade Glacier March 22, 2025
  • Made-in-India Web Browser March 22, 2025
  • Charting a route for IORA under India’s chairship March 22, 2025
  • Mar-a-Lago Accord and dollar devaluation March 22, 2025

About

If IAS is your destination, begin your journey with Optimize IAS.

Hi There, I am Santosh I have the unique distinction of clearing all 6 UPSC CSE Prelims with huge margins.

I mastered the art of clearing UPSC CSE Prelims and in the process devised an unbeatable strategy to ace Prelims which many students struggle to do.

Contact us

moc.saiezimitpo@tcatnoc

For More Details

Work with Us

Connect With Me

Course Portal
Search