Supreme Court Judgment on Remission Without Application
- February 21, 2025
- Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
- Category: DPN Topics
No Comments
Supreme Court Judgment on Remission Without Application
Sub: Polity
Sec: Executive
Context:
- The Supreme Court has directed states with remission policies to consider the premature release of prisoners even if they do not apply for remission.
- This ruling marks a significant shift from earlier judgments that required prisoners to apply for remission.
What is Remission?
- Remission refers to the power to reduce the period of a sentence for a convicted person.
- Governed by Section 473 of the BNSS, 2023 and Section 432 of the CrPC, 1973.
- State governments have the power to grant remission “at any time” with or without conditions.
- If conditions are not fulfilled, remission can be canceled, and the convict can be rearrested without a warrant.
- Separate from the power of the President (Article 72) and Governor (Article 161) to grant clemency.
Legal Restrictions on Remission
- Section 475 of BNSS (formerly Section 433A of CrPC) restricts remission for life convicts guilty of offences punishable by death.
- Such convicts must serve at least 14 years before being considered for release.
- The law previously stated that remission could begin only when a convict applies for it.
Supreme Court’s Ruling
- Delivered by a bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan in the suo motu case “In Re: Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail” (2021).
- The court ruled that an application is not necessary for remission if a state has a remission policy with eligibility criteria.
- Failure to consider remission suo motu would be “discriminatory and arbitrary”, violating Article 14 (Right to Equality).
Previous SC Judgments on Remission
- Sangeet & Anr. v State of Haryana (2013)
- Held that remission cannot be granted suo motu by the state.
- Stressed that remission requires an application from the convict or on their behalf.
- Prevented en masse releases on festive occasions.
- Mohinder Singh v State of Punjab (2013)
- Reaffirmed that courts cannot grant remission suo motu.
- The recent SC decision overrules these precedents in light of state remission policies.
Directions Issued by the Supreme Court
- Mandatory Remission Policies
- States must create “exhaustive” remission policies within two months if not already in place.
- Guidelines for Remission Conditions (Based on Mafabhai Motibhai Sagar v. State of Gujarat, 2024)
- Conditions must consider:
- Motive of the crime
- Criminal background
- Public safety
- Conditions must promote rehabilitation and prevent criminal tendencies.
- Conditions must not be vague, oppressive, or impossible to fulfill.
- Conditions must consider:
- Cancellation of Remission
- Breach of conditions should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
- Minor breaches should not lead to cancellation.
- A notice must be given to the convict before remission is canceled.
Prison Population in India
- As per NCRB data (2022):
- 5,73,220 prisoners in India against a capacity of 4,36,266 (occupancy rate 131.4%).
- 75.8% of prisoners are undertrials, awaiting the final decision in their cases.
- Premature Releases Due to Remission
- 2020 – 2,321 prisoners
- 2021 – 2,350 prisoners
- 2022 – 5,035 prisoners (sharp increase)