Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
    • PYQ Mastery Program
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
      • PYQ Mastery Program
    • Portal Login

    Supreme Court Reserves Order on Inheritance Rights of Children from Invalid Marriages

    • August 19, 2023
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

     

     

    Supreme Court Reserves Order on Inheritance Rights of Children from Invalid Marriages

    Subject :Polity

    Section: Msc

    Case Background and Context

    • The case centers on the interpretation of Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
    • Section 16 aims to legitimize children from null and void marriages as legitimate if the marriage were valid.
    • Section 16(3) restricts the inheritance rights of children from void or annulled marriages.

    Revanasidappa v Mallikarjun Judgment (2011)

    • Division Bench: Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly.
    • Children from void and voidable marriages deserve rights equal to those born from valid marriages.
    • Children have rights over both self-acquired and ancestral property of their parents.
    • Emphasized that a child’s legitimacy is independent of the parent’s relationship.
    • Acknowledged changing social norms and the evolving concept of legitimacy.
    • Clarified that children’s claims extend only to parental property, not other relations’ property.

    Differing Views and Larger Bench

    • 2011 Division Bench decision contradicted earlier Supreme Court judgments.
    • Referral to a larger three-judge bench to reconcile conflicting views.

    Supreme Court Bench

    • Three-judge bench: Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra.

    Prior Supreme Court Cases

    • Bharatha Matha & Another v. R. Vijaya Renganathan & Others (2010): Children from void marriages can’t claim ancestral coparcenary property, only self-acquired property.
    • Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram (2003): Similar to Bharatha Matha, children from void marriages have rights only in self-acquired property.

    The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 

    Introduction 

    • The Hindu Marriage Act is a significant law in India regulating marriages among Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs.
    • Enacted in 1955, it also applies to individuals not belonging to Muslim, Christian, Parsi, or Jewish faiths.
    • Aims to regulate, safeguard, and uphold the institution of marriage within the Hindu community.

    Structure and Purpose of the Act

    • Comprises six chapters and 29 sections, outlining diverse aspects of Hindu marriages.
    • Sets conditions for a valid Hindu marriage, including age, mental capacity, and prohibited relationships.
    • Defines ceremonies, both traditional and court-registered, to solemnize Hindu marriages.
    • Stresses the significance of registering marriages to ensure legal recognition and protection of rights.

    Important Sections 

    • Section 9: Restitution of Conjugal Rights
    • Section 13: Grounds for Divorce
    • Section 16: Legitimacy of Children

    Section 24: Maintenance and Alimony

    Polity Supreme Court Reserves Order on Inheritance Rights of Children from Invalid Marriages
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search