Biofertilizer scheme gets Cabinet nod; sugarcane FRP hiked
- June 29, 2023
- Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
- Category: DPN Topics
No Comments
Biofertilizer scheme gets Cabinet nod; sugarcane FRP hiked
Subject: Schemes
Context:
- The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) approved the PM-PRANAM (PM Programme for Restoration, Awareness, Generation, Nourishment and Amelioration of Mother Earth) scheme.
Urea subsidy scheme:
- The CCEA also approved the continuation of the urea subsidy scheme to ensure constant availability of urea to the farmers at the same price of ₹242/ 45 kg per bag.
PM- PRANAM Scheme:
- Objectives: To encourage the balanced use of fertilisers in conjunction with bio fertilisers and organic fertilisers.
- Aim: To bring down the subsidy burden on chemical fertilisers, which is estimated to reach Rs 2.25 lakh crore in 2022-23 — 39% higher than 2021 figure of Rs 1.62 lakh crore.
- The new scheme would promote the use of nutrient-based, biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture and it would have a total outlay of ₹3,70,128.7 crore.
- Out of the above-approved package, ₹3,68,676.7 crore has been committed for urea subsidy for three years. This is apart from the recently approved nutrient-based subsidy of ₹38,000 crore for the Kharif season for 2023-24.
- Features of the Scheme:
- The scheme will have no separate budget and will be financed through the “savings of existing fertiliser subsidy” under schemes run by the Department of Fertilizers.
- 50% of subsidy savings will be passed on as a grant to the state that saves the money.
- 70% of the grant provided under the scheme can be used for asset creation related to the technological adoption of alternate fertilisers and alternate fertiliser production units at the village, block and district levels.
- The remaining 30% of grant money can be used for rewarding and encouraging farmers, panchayats, farmer producer organisations and self-help groups that are involved in the reduction of fertiliser use and awareness generation.
- The calculation of reducing the chemical fertiliser use of urea in a year will be compared to the average consumption of urea during the last three years.
- For this purpose, data available on a Fertilizer Ministry dashboard, IFMS (Integrated Fertilizers Management System) will be used.
Benefits to sugarcane farmers:
- The CCEA also hiked the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) of sugarcane by ₹10 per quintal.
- The FRP for the sugar season 2023-24 (October-September) will be ₹315 per quintal for a basic recovery rate of 10.25%. Last year, the amount was ₹305.
- The CCEA also decided to provide a premium of ₹ 3.07 per quintal for each 0.1% increase in recovery over and above 10.25%, and a reduction in FRP by ₹ 3.07 per quintal for every 0.1% decrease in recovery (sugar produced from the sugarcane).
- The Centre has calculated the cost of production of sugarcane as ₹ 157 per quintal based on the inputs from States and the Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP).
- This FRP of ₹ 315 per quintal at a recovery rate of 10.25% is higher by 100.6% over production cost. The FRP for sugar season 2023-24 is 3.28% higher than the current sugar season 2022-23.
Few initiatives in news:
Initiatives in news | Description |
GOBAR (Galvanizing Organic Bio-Agro Resources) – DHAN scheme. | Recent Developments:
About the scheme:
Aims:
|
Nano Fertilizers | Recent developments:
Nano Urea Liquid:
About Nano fertilizers:
|
Ethanol Blending Programme | Recent Developments:
What is Ethanol Blending?
|
Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) for Sugarcane | What is the FRP?
Which Factors are considered for announcing FRP?
How is FRP Paid?
|
Biofertilizers
- Biofertilizers are defined as preparations containing living cells or latent cells of efficient strains of microorganisms that help crop plants’ uptake of nutrients by their interactions in the rhizosphere when applied through seed or soil.
- They accelerate certain microbial processes in the soil which augment the extent of availability of nutrients in a form easily assimilated by plants.
They can be grouped in different ways based on their nature and function:
S. No. | Groups | Examples |
N2 fixing Biofertilizers | ||
1. | Free-living | Azotobacter, Beijerinkia, Clostridium, Klebsiella, Anabaena, Nostoc, |
2. | Symbiotic | Rhizobium, Frankia, Anabaena azollae |
3. | Associative Symbiotic | Azospirillum |
P Solubilizing Biofertilizers | ||
1. | Bacteria | Bacillus megaterium var. phosphaticum, Bacillus subtilis Bacillus circulans, Pseudomonas striata |
2. | Fungi | Penicillium sp, Aspergillus awamori |
P Mobilizing Biofertilizers | ||
1. | Arbuscular mycorrhiza | Glomus sp.,Gigasporasp.,Acaulospora sp., Scutellospora sp. &Sclerocystis sp. |
2. | Ectomycorrhiza | Laccaria sp., Pisolithus sp., Boletus sp., Amanita sp. |
3. | Ericoid mycorrhizae | Pezizellaericae |
4. | Orchid mycorrhiza | Rhizoctonia solani |
Biofertilizers for Micro nutrients | ||
1. | Silicate and Zinc solubilizers | Bacillus sp. |
Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria | ||
1. | Pseudomonas | Pseudomonas fluorescens |