What was the tussle over Covaxin IPR?
- June 30, 2024
- Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
- Category: DPN Topics
No Comments
What was the tussle over Covaxin IPR?
Sub: Science and tech
Sec: Intellectual Property Rights
Covaxin:
- Covaxin (development name, BBV152) is a whole inactivated virus-based COVID-19 vaccine developed by Bharat Biotech in collaboration with the Indian Council of Medical Research – National Institute of Virology.
- On 3 November 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) validated the vaccine for emergency use, as the first Indian-developed covid vaccine to be approved.
- By 31 January 2022, Covaxin had been granted emergency use approval in 13 countries.
Admission of Patent Filing Error by Bharat Biotech:
- Bharat Biotech International Limited (BBIL) admitted to an error in its patent filings for Covaxin.
- Scientists from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) were not included as co-inventors.
- BBIL is one of India’s leading biotechnology companies.
Rights Governing Vaccine Patents:
- India’s patent laws cover both product and process patents.
- Product patents grant a monopoly over a drug, while process patents prevent competitors from using the same production steps.
- BBIL patented the process of making Covaxin from virus strains provided by ICMR-NIV (National Institute of Virology).
- Creating a vaccine on an industrial scale requires specialized facilities beyond lab capabilities.
- Covaxin is an inactivated coronavirus vaccine with an added adjuvant to increase potency.
- Companies strive to protect their processes to maintain a temporary monopoly and profits.
- Patents are only granted after regulatory authorities confirm the novelty or inventiveness of the process.
- BBIL has not yet been granted these patents.
- For details of IPR
Roles of BBIL and ICMR:
- BBIL had collaborated with the ICMR-NIV for all the steps in developing a vaccine.
- An agreement outlining each entity’s responsibilities, including ICMR’s role in testing and funding.
- Beyond transferring the strains and making vaccines, ICMR would also test these vaccines on animals and then on people to establish that the vaccine worked as intended.
- ICMR funded clinical trials and was to receive 5% of royalties from Covaxin sales.
- Joint intellectual property rights were expected, as stated in Parliament.
- BBIL initially distinguished between rights over vaccine making and data from clinical trials.
- BBIL later acknowledged the mistake and committed to amending patent applications to include ICMR personnel.
Importance of Being Cited as an Inventor:
- Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) cover various aspects of product invention.
- The development of pharmaceutical products often involves multiple entities.
- BBIL had a technology licensing agreement with Virovax for the adjuvant.
- Being listed as an inventor affects the sharing of IPR, royalties, and product usage.
- Omitting inventors in patent filings can lead to rejection of applications, particularly in the U.S.
Source: TH