Optimize IAS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Prelims Test Series
      • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
    • Mains Mentorship
      • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
    • Mains Master Notes
    • PYQ Mastery Program
  • Portal Login
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Prelims Test Series
        • LAQSHYA 2026 Prelims Mentorship
      • Mains Mentorship
        • Arjuna 2026 Mains Mentorship
      • Mains Master Notes
      • PYQ Mastery Program
    • Portal Login

    What was the tussle over Covaxin IPR?

    • June 30, 2024
    • Posted by: OptimizeIAS Team
    • Category: DPN Topics
    No Comments

     

     

    What was the tussle over Covaxin IPR?

    Sub: Science and tech

    Sec: Intellectual Property Rights

    Covaxin:

    • Covaxin (development name, BBV152) is a whole inactivated virus-based COVID-19 vaccine developed by Bharat Biotech in collaboration with the Indian Council of Medical Research – National Institute of Virology.
    • On 3 November 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) validated the vaccine for emergency use, as the first Indian-developed covid vaccine to be approved.
    • By 31 January 2022, Covaxin had been granted emergency use approval in 13 countries.

    Admission of Patent Filing Error by Bharat Biotech:

    • Bharat Biotech International Limited (BBIL) admitted to an error in its patent filings for Covaxin.
    • Scientists from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) were not included as co-inventors.
    • BBIL is one of India’s leading biotechnology companies.

    Rights Governing Vaccine Patents:

    • India’s patent laws cover both product and process patents.
    • Product patents grant a monopoly over a drug, while process patents prevent competitors from using the same production steps.
    • BBIL patented the process of making Covaxin from virus strains provided by ICMR-NIV (National Institute of Virology).
    • Creating a vaccine on an industrial scale requires specialized facilities beyond lab capabilities.
    • Covaxin is an inactivated coronavirus vaccine with an added adjuvant to increase potency.
    • Companies strive to protect their processes to maintain a temporary monopoly and profits.
    • Patents are only granted after regulatory authorities confirm the novelty or inventiveness of the process.
    • BBIL has not yet been granted these patents.
    • For details of IPR

    Roles of BBIL and ICMR:

    • BBIL had collaborated with the ICMR-NIV for all the steps in developing a vaccine.
    • An agreement outlining each entity’s responsibilities, including ICMR’s role in testing and funding.
      • Beyond transferring the strains and making vaccines, ICMR would also test these vaccines on animals and then on people to establish that the vaccine worked as intended.
    • ICMR funded clinical trials and was to receive 5% of royalties from Covaxin sales.
    • Joint intellectual property rights were expected, as stated in Parliament.
    • BBIL initially distinguished between rights over vaccine making and data from clinical trials.
    • BBIL later acknowledged the mistake and committed to amending patent applications to include ICMR personnel.

    Importance of Being Cited as an Inventor:

    • Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) cover various aspects of product invention.
    • The development of pharmaceutical products often involves multiple entities.
    • BBIL had a technology licensing agreement with Virovax for the adjuvant.
    • Being listed as an inventor affects the sharing of IPR, royalties, and product usage.
    • Omitting inventors in patent filings can lead to rejection of applications, particularly in the U.S.

    Source: TH

    Science and tech What was the tussle over Covaxin IPR?
    Footer logo
    Copyright © 2015 MasterStudy Theme by Stylemix Themes
        Search